10-1665•Charity Wierman v. Casey's General Stores
10-1665Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31 de mar. de 2011
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 10-2686
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Southern
* District of Iowa.
Troy Edison Phillips, *
* [PUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: February 17, 2011
Filed: March 11, 2011
___________
Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Troy Phillips pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute in excess of
100 kilograms of marijuana, a violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B)(vii),
846. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the parties stipulated to a drug quantity of between
100 and 400 kilograms of marijuana and a base offense level of 26. See U.S.S.G. §
2D1.1(c)(7). The Presentence Investigation Report (“PSR”) recommended a two-level
upward adjustment for obstruction of justice and a three-level downward adjustment
for acceptance of responsibility for a total offense level of 25.
-- 1 of 3 --
1 The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the
Southern District of Iowa.
2 It is undisputed that the district court properly assigned Phillips one criminal
history point based on his 2000 conviction for driving while intoxicated. See U.S.S.G.
§ 4A1.2, comment. (n.5) (“Convictions for driving while intoxicated or under the
influence (and similar offenses by whatever name they are known) are counted.”).
-2-
The PSR reported that in 2001 Phillips was convicted of “driving while barred”
in violation of Iowa Code § 321.561. The PSR attributed one criminal history point
to Phillips based on this conviction, which, when combined with a criminal history
point attributable to a 2000 Iowa conviction for driving while intoxicated, gave
Phillips a total of two criminal history points. Phillips filed an objection to the scoring
of a criminal history point based on the conviction for driving while barred, which the
district court 1 overruled. Because Phillips had a resulting criminal history category
of II, the court determined that he was ineligible for safety-valve relief, see 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(f)(1) (providing that the court is bound by the applicable statutory minimum
sentence where the defendant has more than one criminal history point); U.S.S.G.
§ 5C1.2(a)(1), and sentenced him to the mandatory minimum of 60 months’
imprisonment, see 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B) (prescribing a mandatory minimum
sentence of 5 years’ imprisonment for violations of § 841(a) involving 100 or more
kilograms of marijuana).
Phillips argues that the district court erroneously considered his conviction for
driving while barred in calculating his criminal history points.2 According to Phillips,
the offense is a misdemeanor of a type exempted under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(c)(1). In its
response brief, the Government counters that, although a misdemeanor, Phillips’s
conviction for driving while barred is not “similar to” any of the exempted offenses
listed in § 4A1.2(c)(1) and, accordingly, that the district court properly included the
conviction in the criminal history calculation.
-- 2 of 3 --
3 It is therefore irrelevant that Phillips’s conviction for driving while barred
earned him only a sixty-day sentence, suspended after seven days.
-3-
The parties’ characterization of their dispute favors trees to the exclusion of a
much simpler forest—as the Government belatedly pointed out in a letter filed
pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 28(j). Under the advisory guidelines, the crime of driving
while barred is considered a felony offense, not a misdemeanor. A “felony offense”
for sentencing purposes includes any federal, state, or local offense punishable by
death or a term of imprisonment exceeding one year, regardless of the actual sentence
imposed.3 § 4A1.2(o). And, unlike misdemeanors, all felony offenses are included
in the calculation of a defendant’s criminal history. § 4A1.2(c)(1).
Although Iowa Code § 321.561 classifies the offense of driving while barred
as an “aggravated misdemeanor,” the accompanying punishment under Iowa law is
imprisonment for up to two years. Iowa Code § 903.1(2). Indeed, this court has
confirmed, under similar circumstances, that a crime designated as an aggravated
misdemeanor under Iowa law falls within the definition of a felony offense under the
advisory guidelines. United States v. Postley, 449 F.3d 831, 832 (8th Cir. 2006); cf.
United States v. Harrison, 261 F. App’x 499, 500 (4th Cir. 2008) (unpublished per
curiam). We therefore reiterate that an Iowa conviction for an aggravated
misdemeanor is treated as a felony offense for purposes of § 4A1.2(c). As a result,
Phillips’s conviction properly was included in calculating a criminal history category
of II, and the district court did not err in determining that Phillips was ineligible for
safety-valve relief.
For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
______________________________
-- 3 of 3 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.