United States v. Wesley Running Shield

09-1634Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit28 de mai. de 2010

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 09-3614
___________
Debby Rose, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Western
* District of Missouri.
Cox Health Systems, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee, *
*
Wal-Mart Supercenter, *
*
Defendant, *
*
Springfield-Greene County *
Health Department, *
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: May 6, 2010
Filed: May 26, 2010
___________
Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.

-- 1 of 2 --

1The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
-2-
Debby Rose appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment
in her disability-discrimination action. After reviewing the record de novo, and
viewing it in the light most favorable to Rose, see Huber v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 486
F.3d 480, 482 (8th Cir. 2007) (standard of review), we conclude that summary
judgment was proper. For the reasons stated by the district court, we agree that there
was insufficient evidence to show that Rose was a qualified individual with a
disability or a person “regarded as” disabled. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir.
R. 47B. We also deny Rose’s pending motion to supplement the record with
documents that were not before the district court, see United States v. Drefke, 707
F.2d 978, 983 (8th Cir. 1983) (appellate court must review case on record before
district court), and deny her pending motion to stay.
______________________________

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.