Gabriel Wade Mills v. John Anderson

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-3870
___________
Larry Coffman; *
*
Appellant, *
*
Theodore Ginnery, *
*
Plaintiff, * Appeals from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * Eastern District of Missouri
*
Linda Meade; Jay Englehart; Alan * [UNPUBLISHED]
Blake; John Rosenboom, Dr., *
*
Appellees. *
___________
No. 07-1040
___________
Larry Coffman; Theodore Ginnery, *
*
Appellants, *
*
v. *
*
Linda Meade; Jay Englehart; Alan *
Blake; John Rosenboom, Dr., *
*
Appellees. *

-- 1 of 2 --

1We find that Theodore Ginnery is not a party to the instant appeals. See
Scarrella v. Midwest Fed. Sav. & Loan, 536 F.2d 1207, 1209 (8th Cir. 1976) (per
curiam).
2The Honorable Thomas C. Mummert, United States Magistrate Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
-2-
___________
Submitted: March 5, 2008
Filed: March 10, 2008
___________
Before BYE, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated matters, Larry Coffman 1 appeals following the district
court’s 2 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit. Having
conducted de novo review of the record, see Senty-Haugen v. Goodno, 462 F.3d 876,
880, 885, 890-91 (8th Cir. 2006), cert. denied, 127 S. Ct. 2048 (2007), we agree with
the district court that there were no disputed issues of material fact and defendants
were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir.
R. 47B.
______________________________

-- 2 of 2 --