United States v. Scott Donald Wiele

06-2821Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31 de out. de 2007

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

1The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Arkansas.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-4170
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Western District of Arkansas.
Titus Parks, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: September 24, 2007
Filed: October 12, 2007
___________
Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Titus Parks appeals the 151-month prison sentence imposed by the district
court 1 following his guilty plea to distributing a mixture or substance containing
cocaine base (crack cocaine). Citing United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005),
Parks challenges (1) the 100:1 quantity ratio used for sentencing crack-cocaine versus
powder-cocaine offenders, and (2) mandatory minimum sentences in drug cases.
Upon review, we hold that Parks’s appeal is without merit. See, e.g., United States
v. Castro-Higuero, 473 F.3d 880, 888 (8th Cir. 2007) (rejecting argument that Booker

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
made mandatory minimum sentences unconstitutional); United States v. Spears, 469
F.3d 1166, 1176 (8th Cir. 2006) (en banc) (“[N]either Booker nor § 3553(a) authorizes
district courts to reject the 100:1 quantity ratio and use a different ratio in sentencing
defendants for crack cocaine offenses.”).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.