United States v. Brian Bear Heels

05-3294Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31 de out. de 2006

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

1 The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, United States District Judge for the
District of Nebraska.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-3464
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Nebraska.
Ignacio Carrera-Marino, also known as *
Judas Lozano, also known as Chivo, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: September 27, 2006
Filed: October 4, 2006
___________
Before RILEY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Ignacio Carrera-Marino (Marino) appeals the 120-month prison sentence
imposed by the district court 1 after Marino pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute
and possess with the intent to distribute 50 grams or more of actual
methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1), and 846. On
appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v.

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that Marino believes the sentence is
unreasonable.
Marino’s offense carried a statutory mandatory minimum sentence of 120
months’ imprisonment. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A). Because Marino had more
than one criminal history point, he was ineligible for safety-valve relief from the
statutory minimum sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(1). Thus, Marino’s sentence
is not unreasonable because the district court had no authority to impose a lower
sentence. See United States v. Chacon, 330 F.3d 1065, 1066 (8th Cir. 2003) (only
authority for district court to depart from statutory minimum sentence is found in 18
U.S.C. § 3553(e) and (f), which apply only when government makes a motion for
substantial assistance or defendant qualifies for safety-valve relief).
Having reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we
find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment, and
we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
______________________________

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.