98-1388•Anthony Kingsberry v. USA
98-1388Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31 de jan. de 2000
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-2408
___________
Richard W. Caw, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Western
* District of Missouri.
Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of *
Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: January 12, 2000
Filed: January 20, 2000
___________
Before HANSEN, BRIGHT, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Richard W. Caw appeals the district court's order affirming the Commissioner's
decision to deny Caw supplemental security income benefits. Having reviewed the
record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that no error of law or fact appears. We are
also satisfied this case presents no novel issues to justify an extended opinion. We find
substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the decision of the
Commissioner, and Caw is not disabled for social security purposes. We thus affirm
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
on the basis of the district court's ruling without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R.
47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.