Brandon Stollings v. RYOBI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
August 13, 2013
Before
DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge
JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge
DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge
No. 12-2984
BRANDON STOLLINGS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
RYOBI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and ONE
WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern
Division.
No. 08 C 4006
Gary S. Feinerman,
Judge.
ORDER
The opinion issued on August 2, 2013 is hereby AMENDED as follows:
On page 19, the fifth sentence in the full paragraph before heading “B” is amended
as follows: “The court then concluded that Graham’s testimony had to be excluded under
Federal Rule of Evidence Civil Procedure 702 because the fact that the 90 percent
effectiveness input was not reliable rendered Graham’s entire opinion unreliable.” As
amended the sentence now reads: “The court then concluded that Graham’s testimony had
to be excluded under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 because the fact that the 90 percent
effectiveness input was not reliable rendered Graham’s entire opinion unreliable.”
On page 27, the second sentence in the paragraph starting after heading “III” is
amended by deleting the period at the end of the phrase “correctly states the law” and a
comma is inserted in its place, just before the citation to Lewis v. City of Chicago Police Dep’t.

-- 1 of 1 --