United States of America v. Lavar Harris

United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
June 30, 2006
Before
Hon. RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge
Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge
Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge
No. 04-1786
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
LAVAR HARRIS,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District
Court for the Northern District of
Illinois, Eastern Division
No. 02 CR 1129
Joan B. Gottschall,
Judge.
O R D E R
After we ordered a limited remand, see United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220
(2005); United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471, 484 (7th Cir. 2003), the district
judge informed us that she would have imposed the same sentence on Lavar Harris
had she known the sentencing guidelines were advisory. Because that sentence is
within the properly calculated guidelines range, it is presumptively reasonable.
United States v. Mykytiuk, 415 F.3d 606, 608 (7th Cir. 2005). Harris contends that
Mykytiuk was wrongly decided, but does not identify any basis under the factors
outlined in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) to question the reasonableness of his sentence. Our
independent review uncovers nothing to suggest unreasonableness, therefore the
judgment is AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED ORDER
Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53

-- 1 of 1 --