United States of America v. Daniel Ross

United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
June 7, 2006
Before
Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge
Hon. JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge
Hon. ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge
No. 04-2584
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
DANIEL ROSS,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District
Court for the Southern District of
Illinois.
No. 02 CR 40004
William D. Stiehl,
Judge.
O R D E R
After we ordered a limited remand, see United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220
(2005); United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471, 484 (7th Cir. 2003), the district
judge informed us that he would have imposed the same sentence on Daniel Ross
had he known the sentencing guidelines were advisory. Because that sentence is
within the properly calculated guidelines range, it is presumptively reasonable.
United States v. Mykytiuk, 415 F.3d 606, 608 (7th Cir. 2005). Ross now contends
that his sentence is unreasonable because it is longer than necessary to promote
respect for the law and because his time incarcerated will leave him inadequately
educated and vocationally unprepared. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). But neither these
arguments nor our independent review suggest unreasonableness, and therefore the
judgment is AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED ORDER
Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53

-- 1 of 1 --