United States of America v. Daniel Rodriguez

03-2523Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit27 de abr. de 2006

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
April 27, 2006
Before
Hon. JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge
Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge
Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge
No. 03-2523
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
DANIEL RODRIGUEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeals from the United States
District Court for the Northern
District of Illinois, Eastern Division
No. 01 CR 891
Charles R. Norgle, Sr.
Judge.
O R D E R
After we ordered a limited remand, see United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220
(205); United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471, 484 (7th Cir. 2003), the district
judge informed us that he would have imposed the same sentence on Daniel
Rodriguez had he known the sentencing guidelines were advisory. Because that
sentence was within the properly calculated guidelines range, it was presumptively
reasonable. United States v. Mykytiuk, 415 F.3d 606, 608 (7th Cir. 2005).
Rodriguez filed no response to rebut that presumption and our independent review
uncovers nothing to suggest unreasonableness, therefore the judgment is
AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED ORDER
Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53

-- 1 of 1 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.