Dealer Computer Services, Inc., F.k.a. Ford Dealer Computer Services, Inc v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan FOX VALLEY FORD

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 09a0102n.06
Filed: February 6, 2009
No. 08-1572
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
DEALER COMPUTER SERVICES, INC., F.K.A.
FORD DEALER COMPUTER SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff-Appellant,
On Appeal from the
v. United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Michigan
FOX VALLEY FORD
Defendant-Appellee.
______________________________
Before: KENNEDY, MARTIN, and COLE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM. Dealer Computer Services, Inc. (“Dealer Computer”) appeals the district
court’s order denying its motion to vacate an arbitration award permitting Fox Valley Ford (“Fox
Valley”) to proceed by class arbitration of its contract claims with other car dealerships. Dealer
Computer sold and provided repair for computer hardware and software to car dealerships across the
country. Fox Valley was among such dealerships. Dealer Computer used boilerplate contracts with
Fox Valley and the other car dealerships.
On November 18, 2008, after the parties filed their briefs in this appeal, this Court in Dealer
Computer Servs., Inc. v. Dub Herring Ford, 547 F.3d 558 (6th Cir. 2008), decided a case that is
virtually identical to the case before us. Dealer Computer was the plaintiff-appellant in both cases.
The contracts in both cases have identical arbitration clauses. The procedural posture is the same.
Even the attorneys are the same. In Dub Herring Ford, we held that we lacked jurisdiction to
consider Dealer Computer’s motion to vacate the arbitration award for its lack of ripeness. Id. at

-- 1 of 2 --

559. The arbitration panel had not yet certified the car dealerships’ claims for class arbitration; it
merely decided that the arbitration clauses in Dealer Computer’s contracts did not preclude class
arbitration. The status of the arbitration award is the same here. The Dub Herring Ford court noted
that the car dealerships may ultimately fail to secure class certification for their claims and if that
occurs, the appellant will not be harmed. Id. at 561-62. Furthermore, if the car dealerships obtain
class certification, the appellant can still obtain judicial review before commencement of class
arbitration and resolution of the merits. Id. at 562-63.
Following Dub Herring Ford, we VACATE the order of the district court and REMAND the
case to the district court with instructions to DISMISS for lack of jurisdiction.

-- 2 of 2 --