Jack Sunseri; Consolidated Partners, Limited v. Phyllis Proctor

The Honorable Jerome Farris, Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the*
Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 08a0501n.06
Filed: August 18, 2008
No. 07-1715
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
JACK SUNSERI; CONSOLIDATED
PARTNERS, LIMITED,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
PHYLLIS PROCTOR; CONRAD PROCTOR;
DAVID PROCTOR; CONRAD A.
PROCTOR FAMILY TRUST; PHYLLIS
PROCTOR FAMILY TRUST; ANDERSON-
PROCTOR TRUST; PHYLLIS D. PROCTOR
TRUST; ANDERSON-PROCTOR FAMILY
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; PROCTOR, LLC;
ANDERSON-PROCTOR, LLC,
Defendants-Appellees.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Before: DAUGHTREY, COOK, and FARRIS, Circuit Judges.*
COOK, Circuit Judge. In order to enforce a prior judgment against general partnership
Macro Cellular Partners (“Macro”), plaintiffs Jack Sunseri and Consolidated Partners, Ltd.
(collectively, “Sunseri”), seek to reach the individual assets of defendant partners (collectively, the
“Proctors”) unnamed in the original suit. The district court granted summary judgment for the

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 07-1715
Sunseri, et al. v. Proctor, et al.
Proctors, concluding that Sunseri’s claims against the Proctors accrued with the claims against the
partnership and the relevant statutes of limitations now barred the action. Review of the briefs and
record counsels us to agree with the district court. Because a separate opinion would add little to the
district court’s analysis, we affirm the court’s judgment, adopting its reasoning.

-- 2 of 2 --