Kalil A. Alkasab v. Cleveland State University

*The Honorable James D. Todd, Chief United States District Court Judge for the Western District of Tennessee,
sitting by designation.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 05a0122n.06
Filed: February 15, 2005
No. 03-4435
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
KALIL A. ALKASAB,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY,
Defendant-Appellee.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ON APPEAL FROM THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
C O U R T F O R T H E
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
OHIO
M E M O R A N D U M
O P I N I O N
BEFORE: NORRIS, GIBBONS, Circuit Judges; TODD, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM. Plaintiff, Kalil A. Alkasab, appeals from the district court’s grant of
summary judgment to defendant, Cleveland State University, in this employment discrimination
case.
Having had the benefit of oral argument and having carefully considered the record on
appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, we are not persuaded that the district court
erred in granting summary judgment to defendant.
Because the reasoning which supports judgment for defendant has been articulated by the
district court, the issuance of a detailed written opinion by this court would serve no useful purpose.

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 03-4435
Alkasav v. Cleveland State University
- 2 -
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning employed by that
court in its Order and Decision dated September 26, 2003.

-- 2 of 2 --