99-2276; 99-2376•5 &200 1' ' 25 8//7 v. Reed, 167 F.3d 984, 995 6th Cir. 1999
99-2276; 99-2376Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit13 de fev. de 2002
5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,21
3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH
(/(&7521,& &,7$7,21 )(' $SS 3 WK &LU
)LOH 1DPH DS
81,7('67$7(6&28572)$33($/6
)257+(6,;7+&,5&8,7
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
81,7(' 67$7(6 2) $0(5,&$
3ODLQWLII$SSHOOHH
&URVV$SSHOODQW
Y
-$&. &+,/,1*,5,$1
'HIHQGDQW$SSHOODQW
&URVV$SSHOOHH
;!
1
1RV
$SSHDOIURPWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV'LVWULFW&RXUW
IRUWKH(DVWHUQ'LVWULFWRI0LFKLJDQDW'HWURLW
1R²-RKQ&RUEHWW2¶0HDUD'LVWULFW-XGJH
$UJXHG-XQH
'HFLGHGDQG)LOHG)HEUXDU\
%HIRUH-21(668+5+(,15,&+DQG'$8*+75(<
&LUFXLW-XGJHV
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
&2816(/
$5*8('.HQQHWK+.DUDP3(5$/7$-2+16721
.$5$06W&ODLU6KRUHV0LFKLJDQIRU$SSHOODQW-HQQLIHU
-3HUHJRUG$66,67$1781,7('67$7(6$77251(<
'HWURLW0LFKLJDQIRU$SSHOOHH21%5,().HQQHWK+
-- 1 of 8 --
8QLWHG6WDWHVY&KLOLQJLULDQ 1RV
.DUDP 3(5$/7$ -2+16721 .$5$0 6W &ODLU
6KRUHV 0LFKLJDQ IRU $SSHOODQW -HQQLIHU - 3HUHJRUG
$66,67$17 81,7(' 67$7(6 $77251(< 'HWURLW
0LFKLJDQIRU$SSHOOHH
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
23,1,21
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
1$7+$1,(/5-21(6&LUFXLW-XGJH'HIHQGDQW-DFN
&KLOLQJLULDQDSSHDOVKLVIHGHUDOFRQYLFWLRQDQGVHQWHQFHRQ
PRQH\ODXQGHULQJFKDUJHV2Q$SULODJUDQGMXU\
RIWKH(DVWHUQ'LVWULFWRI0LFKLJDQUHWXUQHGDPXOWLSOHFRXQW
LQGLFWPHQWDJDLQVW&KLOLQJLULDQDQDWWRUQH\DQGWKUHHRIKLV
FOLHQWV-DFN&KDUOHVDQG*HRUJH5DVKLG7KH5DVKLGVZHUH
LQGLFWHG RQ WKH EDVLV RI IUDXGXOHQW EXVLQHVV YHQWXUHV
FRQFHUQLQJ WKH GHYHORSPHQW PDQXIDFWXUH DQG VDOH RI
DXWRPRELOHUDGDUEUDNLQJV\VWHPVWRDYRLGFROOLVLRQV$WD
EHQFK WULDO &KLOLQJLULDQ ZDV FRQYLFWHG RI FRQVSLUDF\ WR
FRPPLWPRQH\ODXQGHULQJ+HZDVVHQWHQFHGWRPRQWKV
LPSULVRQPHQWWZR\HDUVVXSHUYLVHGUHOHDVHDQGUHVWLWXWLRQLQ
WKH DPRXQW RI &KLOLQJLULDQ QRZ DSSHDOV KLV
FRQYLFWLRQ FLWLQJ LQDGHTXDFLHV LQ WKH LQGLFWPHQW DQG
LQFRQVLVWHQFLHV LQ WKH YHUGLFWV DQG FKDOOHQJLQJ WKH %DLO
5HIRUP$FW7KHJRYHUQPHQWFURVVDSSHDOVFRQWHQGLQJWKDW
WKHGHIHQGDQWZDVVHQWHQFHGXQGHUWKHZURQJJXLGHOLQH:H
DJUHH ZLWK WKH JRYHUQPHQW¶V FRQWHQWLRQ DQG WKHUHIRUH
$)),50 WKH GHIHQGDQW¶V FRQYLFWLRQ EXW 5(0$1' WKH
FDVHWRSHUPLWUHVHQWHQFLQJXQGHUWKHDSSURSULDWHSURYLVLRQV
RIWKH6HQWHQFLQJ*XLGHOLQHV
,)$&76
2Q$SULODJUDQGMXU\LQWKH(DVWHUQ'LVWULFWRI
0LFKLJDQUHWXUQHGDPXOWLSOHFRXQWLQGLFWPHQWDJDLQVWWKUHH
EURWKHUV -DFN &KDUOHV DQG *HRUJH 5DVKLG DQG WKHLU
DWWRUQH\ -DFN &KLOLQJLULDQ 7KH LQGLFWPHQW DURVH RXW RI D
VFKHPHODUJHO\FDUULHGRXWE\-DFNDQG&KDUOHV5DVKLGWR
GHIUDXG LQYHVWRUV LQ IUDXGXOHQW EXVLQHVV HQWLWLHV EDVHG RQ
DFWXDORUQHDUO\FRPSOHWHGPXOWLPLOOLRQGROODUFRQWUDFWVIRU
1RV 8QLWHG6WDWHVY&KLOLQJLULDQ
Whether this court views the district court’s action as a
choice between guidelines or a departure, the result is the
same. The heartland analysis that should be applied prior to
determining which guideline applies is identical to the
analysis that should be applied in determining whether a
departure is warranted. See Smith, 186 F.3d at 298.
Moreover, in the departure context, this court has held that the
fact that a money laundering offense involved proceeds
related to unlawful activity other than drug trafficking or
organized crime is not sufficient to take the offense outside of
the heartland of the money laundering guideline. United
States v. Reed, 167 F.3d 984, 995 (6th Cir. 1999); United
States v. Ford, 184 F.3d 566, 587 (6th Cir. 1999). Thus, even
if the district court’s decision is treated not as a departure but
as an application of a more appropriate guideline, the district
court’s rationale was not sufficient to warrant the lower
court’s decision not to apply the money laundering guideline
to the money laundering offense. Accordingly, the district
court’s sentence should be reversed and remanded with
instructions to re-sentence Chilingirian in accordance with the
money laundering guideline.
,9&21&/86,21
)RUWKHUHDVRQVVWDWHGDERYHZH5(9(56(WKHGLVWULFW
FRXUW¶V VHQWHQFLQJ RUGHU DQG 5(0$1' WKH FDVH WR WKH
GLVWULFW FRXUW ZLWK LQVWUXFWLRQV WR UHVHQWHQFH -DFN
&KLOLQJLULDQ LQ DFFRUGDQFH ZLWK WKH PRQH\ ODXQGHULQJ
JXLGHOLQH:H$)),50WKHUHPDLQGHURIWKHGLVWULFWFRXUW¶V
MXGJPHQW
-- 2 of 8 --
8QLWHG6WDWHVY&KLOLQJLULDQ 1RV
The Third Circuit has since clarified the holding of Smith:
Where money laundering is not ‘minimal or incidental,’
and is ‘separate from the underlying crime’ and intended
to ‘make it appear that the funds were legitimate’ or to
funnel money into further criminal activities, § 2S1.1 is
an applicable guideline. The guideline may also be
applicable if there is evidence that the activities which
fulfilled the broad statutory requirements for money
laundering were extensive with drug trafficking or other
serious crime.
United States v. Mustafa, 238 F.3d 485, 495 (3d Cir. 2001)
(quoting United States v. Bockius, 228 F.3d 305, 313 (3d Cir.
2000)). In this case, it could also be argued that even if this
Circuit were to apply Smith, its rationale would fail to
produce the result desired by Chilingirian. The money
laundering in this case was not minimal nor incidental, and it
appears to have been funneled through the client trust account
in order to make it appear legitimate and to further the radar
technology/fraud scheme.
7KH7KLUG&LUFXLWUHOLHGRQ866*$SSHQGL[$
ZKLFKVWDWHV³>L@ILQDQDW\SLFDOFDVHWKHJXLGHOLQHVHFWLRQ
LQGLFDWHGIRUWKHVWDWXWHRIFRQYLFWLRQLVLQDSSURSULDWHEHFDXVH
RIWKHSDUWLFXODUFRQGXFWLQYROYHGXVHWKHJXLGHOLQHVHFWLRQ
PRVWDSSOLFDEOHWRWKHQDWXUHRIWKHRIIHQVHFRQGXFWFKDUJHG
LQ WKH FRXQW RI ZKLFK WKH GHIHQGDQW ZDV FRQYLFWHG´
6LPLODUO\WKLVFRXUWKDVSUHYLRXVO\UHOLHGRQWKLVODQJXDJH
DQGKHOGWKDWWKHGLVWULFWFRXUWPXVWGHFLGHZKLFKJXLGHOLQHLV
PRVWDSSOLFDEOHFRQVLGHULQJWKHIDFWVLQYROYHG6HH8QLWHG
6WDWHVY+RRG)G WK&LU
This portion of the Guidelines Manual has since been
amended so that the sentencing court is now required to use
the guideline that Appendix A says is applicable. See
U.S.S.G., Appendix A (2000). Thus, the Smith approach is
no longer relevant.
1RV 8QLWHG6WDWHVY&KLOLQJLULDQ
)RU D PRUH GHWDLOHG DFFRXQW RI WKH IDFWV UHJDUGLQJ WKH 5DVKLG
LQYHVWPHQW VFKHPHV DQG WKH WULDOV DQG DSSHDOV RI -DFN DQG &KDUOHV 5DVKLG
VHH 8QLWHG 6WDWHV Y 5DVKLG )G WK &LU *HRUJH SOHDGHG
JXLOW\ WR D OHVVHU FKDUJH DQG GLG QRW DSSHDO
WKHVDOHRIDXWRPRELOHUDGDUEUDNLQJV\VWHPVDQGUHODWHGUDGDU
WHFKQRORJ\
&KLOLQJLULDQVHUYHGDVWKHDWWRUQH\IRUWKH5DVKLGVDQGWKH
5DVKLGIDPLO\¶VFRPSDQ\9HKLFOH5DGDU6DIHW\6\VWHPV,QF
³9566´ IURP RU WKURXJK WKH GDWH RI WKH
LQGLFWPHQW+HKHOGDILIWHHQSHUFHQWVKDUHLQ9566
,Q &KLOLQJLULDQ UHSUHVHQWHG 9566 ZKHQ LW ILOHG D
&KDSWHU EDQNUXSWF\ UHRUJDQL]DWLRQ SHWLWLRQ ZKLFK ZDV
ODWHU FRQYHUWHG LQWR D &KDSWHU OLTXLGDWLRQ SURFHHGLQJ
'XULQJWKHSHQGHQF\RIWKHEDQNUXSWF\SURFHHGLQJVDJURXS
RILQYHVWRUVUHIHUUHGWRDVWKH³5XGGHU*URXS´HQWHUHGWKH
SLFWXUH,Q$XJXVW&KDUOHV5XGGHUPHWWKH5DVKLGV
ZKHQKHZDVZRUNLQJIRU*HQFRUS$HURMHW ³$HURMHW´ ZKLFK
ZDVGLVFXVVLQJZLWK9566WKHSRVVLELOLW\RIEX\LQJLWVUDGDU
EUDNLQJWHFKQRORJ\RUSHUKDSVWKHFRPSDQ\,Q'HFHPEHURI
$HURMHWLQIRUPHGWKH5DVKLGVWKDWWKH\ZRXOGQRWJR
IRUZDUG ZLWK DQ\ GHDOV 1HYHUWKHOHVV 5XGGHU DQG RWKHU
SHRSOHZKRNQHZ&KLOLQJLULDQDOVRLQYHVWHGLQ9566
,QHDUO\LQOLJKWRIWKHEDQNUXSWF\WKH5XGGHUVEHJDQ
WDSLQJ WHOHSKRQH FRQYHUVDWLRQV ZLWK WKH 5DVKLGV DQG
&KLOLQJLULDQ,QRQHRIWKHVHFRQYHUVDWLRQV&KLOLQJLULDQVDLG
WKDWKHKDGEHHQZRUNLQJRQVRPHWKLQJWKDWZDVJRLQJWREH
IDEXORXV Chilingirian also reassured RWKHUs that he was
working on several deals.
In mid-1995, Chilingirian attempted to settle all of the
bankruptcy claims against VRSS and the Rashids with money
available from a group of investors known as the "Tindall
Group." Paul Tindall, and his wife Ann Louise, lived in
Canada and were related to Jack Rashid’s wife. The Tindalls
met with Jack Rashid in January 1995. In late June 1995, the
Rashids went to Toronto to present their technology to, and
-- 3 of 8 --
8QLWHG6WDWHVY&KLOLQJLULDQ 1RV
seek investments from, a group of over thirty people who
learned of this opportunity through Paul Tindall.
In December 1995, Advanced Radar Systems ("ART") was
incorporated in Canada in order to take in the money from the
Canadian investors. Neither the Rashids nor Chilingirian
informed the Canadian investors about VRSS’s bankruptcy or
their plan to use the investors’ money to pay creditors. The
Canadians invested heavily, but the money was put into
VRSS. According to the government’s summary, the records
of Chilingirian’s client trust fund show that $2.48 million in
checks was given to Jack Rashid by ART-Canada investors.
Chilingirian endorsed $2.267 million of those checks into his
trust account. Chilingirian then wrote $275,000 worth of
checks to himself, gave $1.473 million to Jack Rashid, and
disbursed $480,000 to settle various investors’ claims against
Rashid. Aside from Peter Tindall, none of the Canadian
investors have ever recouped any money invested with the
Rashids.
When Chilingirian incorporated ART in Canada on behalf
of Jack Rashid, he opened a new client trust account as well.
According to the government, this account was used to
launder money received from the last group of investors, the
"Kraft Group." James Kraft was a long time friend of Jack
Rashid. He was solicited for money in April 1996, and
invested money from his retirement account. He also brought
in contributions from over thirty other investors.
In 1996, Chilingirian and members of the Rudder Group
discussed settlement of the investors’ claims against the
Rashids/VRSS. Some investors did get a portion of their
money back, but they had to sign affidavits exculpating Jack
Rashid. Similarly, despite numerous complaints from
investors, Chilingirian continued to deposit money from the
Kraft Group into his client trust account, then withdraw some
for Jack Rashid and a lesser amount for himself.
On April 23, 1997, Chilingirian was indicted on charges of
conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, mail fraud in
1RV 8QLWHG6WDWHVY&KLOLQJLULDQ
E. Fraud Guideline or Money Laundering Guideline?
The government, on cross-appeal, argues that the district
court erred by sentencing Chilingirian according to the fraud
guidelines, rather than the money laundering guidelines.
Chilingirian was found guilty of conspiracy to commit money
laundering and Jack Rashid pleaded guilty to the same
offense. However, Judge O’Meara sentenced the defendants
according to different sentencing guidelines. He sentenced
Jack Chilingirian according to the sentencing guideline for
fraud (§ 2F1.1) and sentenced Jack Rashid according to the
sentencing guideline for money laundering (§ 2S1.1). The
fraud guideline results in a significantly lower offense level.
The government argues that the court should have applied the
guidelines for money laundering to Chilingirian.
This is a case of first impression in this circuit.
Chilingirian and the district court rely on case law from the
Third Circuit. In United States v. Smith, 186 F.3d 290 (3d
Cir. 1999), the Third Circuit held that the money laundering
guidelines were too harsh to apply to what it described as a
routine fraud case in which the money laundering activity was
an "incidental by-product" of a kick-back scheme. Id. at 300.
The court explained that the sentencing court must perform a
"heartland" analysis when deciding what guideline should be
applied and when deciding whether to depart. See id. at 298.
Thus, in order to determine whether the money laundering
guideline should apply, the court had to determine what
conduct was considered by the Sentencing Commission to fall
within the heartland cases covered under the money
laundering guideline. The court considered the Sentencing
Commission’s proposed amendments to the money
laundering guideline, which were rejected by Congress, and
"conclude[d] that the Sentencing Commission itself has
indicated that the heartland of U.S.S.G. § 2S1.1 is the money
laundering activity connected with extensive drug trafficking
and serious crime." Id. at 300.
-- 4 of 8 --
8QLWHG6WDWHVY&KLOLQJLULDQ 1RV
'0XOWLSOLFLW\GRXEOHMHRSDUG\DQGVSHFLDOILQGLQJV
&KLOLQJLULDQDUJXHVWKDW&RXQWFRQVSLUDF\WRFRPPLW
PRQH\ODXQGHULQJDQG&RXQWIUDXGFRQVSLUDF\
FKDUJHG WKH VDPH FRQVSLUDF\ DQG WKXV WKH LQGLFWPHQW ZDV
PXOWLSOLFLWRXV$FODLPWKDWDQLQGLFWPHQWLVPXOWLSOLFLWRXV
VKRXOG EH UDLVHG EHIRUH WULDO )(' 5 &5,0 3 E
&KLOLQJLULDQGLGQRWUDLVHWKLVFODLPXQWLOKLVDSSHDOWRWKLV
FRXUW7KXVWKHFODLPPDGHLVQRWWLPHO\6HH8QLWHG6WDWHV
Y+DUW)G WK&LU
&KLOLQJLULDQIXUWKHUDUJXHVWKDWZKHQWKHFRXUWDFTXLWWHG
KLP RQ WKH FRQVSLUDF\ FKDUJH WKH GRXEOH MHRSDUG\
FODXVHSUHFOXGHGWKHFRXUWIURPFRQYLFWLQJKLPRQWKHPRQH\
ODXQGHULQJ FKDUJH 7KH GRXEOH MHRSDUG\ FODXVH SURWHFWV
DJDLQVW VXFFHVVLYH SURVHFXWLRQV IRU WKH VDPH FULPH DQG
DJDLQVW PXOWLSOH SXQLVKPHQWV IRU WKH VDPH FULPH 6HH
0LVVRXULY+XQWHU86 8QLWHG6WDWHV
Y 6KDUSH )G WK &LU ³>7@KH
SURWHFWLRQ DJDLQVW PXOWLSOH SURVHFXWLRQV LV QRW LPSOLFDWHG
ZKHQ D GHIHQGDQW IDFHV PXOWLSOH FKDUJHV LQ D VLQJOH
SURFHHGLQJ´8QLWHG6WDWHVY%DUUHWW)G WK
&LU &KLOLQJLULDQZDVSURVHFXWHGRQDOORIWKHFKDUJHV
LQDVLQJOHSURFHHGLQJ+HZDVFRQYLFWHGRQRQO\RQHFRXQW
DQGVHQWHQFHGRQO\RQWKDWFRXQW7KXVWKHGRXEOHMHRSDUG\
FODXVHLVQRWLPSOLFDWHG
)LQDOO\&KLOLQJLULDQDUJXHVWKDWKLVFRQVWLWXWLRQDOULJKWWR
GXHSURFHVVZDVYLRODWHGE\WKHGLVWULFWFRXUW¶VUHIXVDOWRLVVXH
VSHFLDOILQGLQJV7KHFRXUWHQWHUHGLWVJHQHUDOILQGLQJRIQRW
JXLOW\RQDOORIWKHFRXQWVH[FHSW&RXQWRQ$SULO
/DWHU RQ 0D\ &KLOLQJLULDQ PRYHG IRU VSHFLDO
ILQGLQJVSXUVXDQWWR)(' 5 &5,0 3 7KHFRXUWGHQLHG
WKHPRWLRQEHFDXVHLWZDVQRWPDGHEHIRUHWKHFRXUWHQWHUHG
LWV JHQHUDO ILQGLQJ 5XOH SURYLGHV ³>,@Q D FDVH WULHG
ZLWKRXWDMXU\WKHFRXUWVKDOOPDNHDJHQHUDOILQGLQJDQGVKDOO
LQDGGLWLRQRQUHTXHVWPDGHEHIRUHWKHJHQHUDOILQGLQJILQG
WKHIDFWVVSHFLDOO\´7KXVWKHGLVWULFWFRXUWDSSURSULDWHO\
GHQLHGWKHPRWLRQ6HH8QLWHG6WDWHVY*XVWDIVRQ1R
:/DW WK&LU-XQH
1RV 8QLWHG6WDWHVY&KLOLQJLULDQ
violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341, wire fraud in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 1343, aiding and abetting the interstate
transportation of funds taken by fraud in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 2314, tampering with a witness in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 1512, and conspiracy to launder money instruments
in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956(a)(1)(A)(i),
1956(a)(1)(B)(i), and 1956(h).
On April 29, 1999, the district court convicted Chilingirian
of conspiracy to commit money laundering. On October 8,
1999, Chilingirian filed a Motion and Brief requesting bail
pending appeal. On October 18, 1999, &KLOLQJLULDQ¶VUHTXHVW
IRU EDLO ZDV GHQLHG DQG he was sentenced to 37 months
imprisonment, 2 years supervised release, and restitution in
the amount of $335,167.50. 2QDSSHDO&KLOLQJLULDQDUJXHV
WKDWWKHGLVWULFWFRXUW¶VGHQLDORIKLVPRWLRQIRUEDLOYLRODWHG
KLV FRQVWLWXWLRQDO ULJKWV +H DOVR DUJXHV WKDW WKH GLVWULFW
FRXUW¶VDFTXLWWDORIKLPRQFHUWDLQRIIHQVHVZDVLQFRQVLVWHQW
ZLWKWKHFRXUW¶VYHUGLFWRIJXLOW\RQWKHFRQVSLUDF\WRFRPPLW
PRQH\ODXQGHULQJFKDUJH)XUWKHU&KLOLQJLULDQDOOHJHVWKDW
FHUWDLQFRXQWVZLWKLQWKHLQGLFWPHQWFKDUJHGWKHVDPHRIIHQVH
DQGWKXVWKHLQGLFWPHQWZDVPXOWLSOLFLWRXV2QFURVVDSSHDO
WKH JRYHUQPHQW DOOHJHV WKDW WKH GLVWULFW FRXUW HUUHG E\
VHQWHQFLQJ&KLOLQJLULDQDFFRUGLQJWRWKHIUDXGJXLGHOLQHV
II. STANDARD OF REVIEW
This court reviews a district court's denial of bail under an
abuse of discretion standard. /HHY-DEH)G
WK&LU 7KH%DLO5HIRUP$FW86& E
FUHDWHVDSUHVXPSWLRQDJDLQVWUHOHDVHSHQGLQJDSSHDO8QLWHG
6WDWHVY9DQFH)G WK&LU
7KLV&RXUWUHYLHZVIRUFOHDUHUURUDGLVWULFWFRXUW¶VIDFWXDO
ILQGLQJVLQLWVDSSOLFDWLRQRIWKH6HQWHQFLQJ*XLGHOLQHV6HH
8QLWHG 6WDWHV Y -RQHV )G WK &LU
FLWLQJ8QLWHG6WDWHVY:LQVWRQ)G WK&LU
+RZHYHUWKHGLVWULFWFRXUW¶VOHJDODSSOLFDWLRQRIWKH
JXLGHOLQHVLVUHYLHZHGGHQRYR6HH8QLWHG6WDWHVY0RVHV
)G WK&LU 7KLV&RXUWUHYLHZVWKH
-- 5 of 8 --
8QLWHG6WDWHVY&KLOLQJLULDQ 1RV
,Q DGGLWLRQ WR UHYHUVDO RU D QHZ WULDO WKH VXEVWDQWLDO TXHVWLRQ RI ODZ
FDQ EH OLNHO\ WR UHVXOW LQ ³ LLL D VHQWHQFH WKDW GRHV QRW LQFOXGH D WHUP RI
LPSULVRQPHQW RU LY D UHGXFHG VHQWHQFH WR D WHUP RI LPSULVRQPHQW OHVV
WKDQ WKH WRWDO RI WKH WLPH DOUHDG\ VHUYHG SOXV WKH H[SHFWHG GXUDWLRQ RI WKH
DSSHDO SURFHVV´ 86& E
TXHVWLRQ RI ZKHWKHU WKHUH ZDV DQ DPHQGPHQW WR WKH
LQGLFWPHQWGHQRYR8QLWHG6WDWHVY5RELVRQ)G
WK&LU FHUWGHQLHG86
,,,$1$/<6,6
$%DLO5HIRUP$FW
7KHGLVWULFWFRXUWGHQLHG&KLOLQJLULDQ¶VPRWLRQVIRUUHOHDVH
RQEDLOSHQGLQJDSSHDO7KHORZHUFRXUWIRXQGWKDWDOWKRXJK
WKH GHIHQGDQW GLG QRW SRVH D ULVN RI IOLJKW RU GDQJHU KLV
DSSHOODWHLVVXHVZHUHQRWVXEVWDQWLDO7KH6XSUHPH&RXUWDOVR
VXEVHTXHQWO\ GHQLHG &KLOLQJLULDQ¶V DSSOLFDWLRQ IRU UHOHDVH
SHQGLQJEDLO&KLOLQJLULDQY8QLWHG6WDWHV86
7LWOH86& E >7KH%DLO5HIRUP$FWRI@
UHTXLUHVDGLVWULFWFRXUWWRPDNHWZRILQGLQJVEHIRUHJUDQWLQJ
EDLO SHQGLQJ DSSHDO 7R HVWDEOLVK HQWLWOHPHQW WR UHOHDVH
SHQGLQJ DSSHDO GHIHQGDQW PXVW VKRZ E\ FOHDU DQG
FRQYLQFLQJHYLGHQFHWKDWKHLVQRWOLNHO\WRIOHHRUSRVHD
GDQJHUWRWKHVDIHW\RIDQRWKHUSHUVRQRUWKHFRPPXQLW\DQG
WKDW WKH DSSHDO LV QRW IRU GHOD\ DQG UDLVHV D VXEVWDQWLDO
TXHVWLRQRIODZRUIDFWOLNHO\WRUHVXOWLQUHYHUVDODQRUGHUIRU
QHZ WULDO RU D VHQWHQFH WKDW GRHV QRW LQFOXGH D WHUP RI
LPSULVRQPHQW 86& E 8QLWHG 6WDWHV Y
3ROODUG)G WK&LU ,QWKLVFDVH
UHOHDVHRQEDLOZDVGHQLHGEHFDXVHGHIHQGDQWIDLOHGWRVKRZ
WKDWWKHDSSHDOUDLVHGDVXEVWDQWLDOTXHVWLRQRIODZ
2QDSSHDO&KLOLQJLULDQDUJXHVWKDW86& E
YLRODWHVWKH'XH3URFHVV&ODXVHRIWKH)LIWK$PHQGPHQWDQG
WKH(LJKWK$PHQGPHQW&KLOLQJLULDQDUJXHVWKDWGHQ\LQJD
FRQYLFWHGLQFDUFHUDWHGGHIHQGDQW¶VEDLOPRWLRQDQGIRUFLQJ
1RV 8QLWHG6WDWHVY&KLOLQJLULDQ
:KLOHWKHGLVWLQFWLRQEHWZHHQDYDULDQFHDQGDFRQVWUXFWLYH
DPHQGPHQW LV VNHWFK\ WKH FRQVHTXHQFHV RI HDFK DUH
VLJQLILFDQWO\ GLIIHUHQW $ YDULDQFH ZLOO QRW FRQVWLWXWH
UHYHUVLEOHHUURUXQOHVV³VXEVWDQWLDOULJKWV´RIWKHGHIHQGDQW
KDYHEHHQDIIHFWHG8QLWHG6WDWHVY+DWKDZD\)G
WK&LU $FRQVWUXFWLYHDPHQGPHQWRQWKHRWKHU
KDQGLV³DYDULDQFHWKDWLVDFFRUGHGWKHSHUVHSUHMXGLFLDO
WUHDWPHQW RI DQ DPHQGPHQW´ EHFDXVH OLNH DQ DFWXDO
DPHQGPHQWLWLQIULQJHVXSRQWKH)LIWK$PHQGPHQW VJUDQG
MXU\JXDUDQWHH6HH)RUG)GDW&RQVHTXHQWO\D
FRQVWUXFWLYHDPHQGPHQWZDUUDQWVUHYHUVDORIDFRQYLFWLRQ
6HH LG 7KH GHIHQGDQW KDV WKH EXUGHQ RI SURYLQJ WKDW WKH
YDULDQFH LQ TXHVWLRQ URVH WR WKH OHYHO RI D FRQVWUXFWLYH
DPHQGPHQW6HH8QLWHG6WDWHVY%ODQGIRUG)G
WK&LU FHUWGHQLHG86
:H FRQFOXGH WKDW &KLOLQJLULDQ¶V LQGLFWPHQW ZDV QRW
EURDGHQHGE\WKHGLVWULFWFRXUW¶VJXLOW\YHUGLFWRQFRQVSLUDF\
WRODXQGHUPRQH\HYHQWKRXJKWKHUHZHUHDFTXLWWDOVRQWKH
IUDXGFRXQWV7KHLQGLFWPHQWOLVWHGPDLODQGZLUHIUDXGDVWKH
XQODZIXO DFWLYLWLHV WKDW JHQHUDWHG WKH SURFHHGV WKDW
&KLOLQJLULDQ FRQVSLUHG WR ODXQGHU %XW DFFRUGLQJ WR WKH
PRQH\ODXQGHULQJVWDWXWHDGHIHQGDQWFDQEHJXLOW\RIPRQH\
ODXQGHULQJDVORQJDVKHNQHZWKDWKLVWUDQVDFWLRQVLQYROYHG
SURFHHGV RI VRPH XQODZIXO DFWLYLW\ KH GRHV QRW KDYH WR
NQRZZKDWIRUPWKHXQODZIXODFWLYLW\WRRN7KHUHIRUHZKLOH
WKHPRQH\GLGKDYHWRKDYHFRPHIURPWKHVSHFLILHGXQODZIXO
DFWLYLW\RIZLUHDQGPDLOIUDXG&KLOLQJLULDQGLGQRWKDYHWR
NQRZWKDWWKLVZDVDQHOHPHQWRIWKHFKDUJHGRIIHQVH*LYHQ
WKDW&KLOLQJLULDQGLGQRWKDYHWREHDZDUHRIWKLVHOHPHQWLW
ZRXOG EH LOORJLFDO WR FRQFOXGH WKDW &KLOLQJLULDQ KLPVHOI
DFWXDOO\KDGWRKDYHFRPPLWWHGWKDWXQODZIXODFWLYLW\
,QVXPSURYLQJWKDW&KLOLQJLULDQFRPPLWWHGPDLODQGZLUH
IUDXG ZDV QHYHU HVVHQWLDO WR SURYLQJ WKDW KH FRQVSLUHG WR
ODXQGHUPRQH\7KHUHIRUHDFRQYLFWLRQIRUWKHODWWHUDWWKH
VDPHWLPHDVDQDFTXLWWDORQWKHIRUPHUGLGQRWUHVXOWLQDQ
DPHQGPHQWWRWKHLQGLFWPHQW
-- 6 of 8 --
8QLWHG6WDWHVY&KLOLQJLULDQ 1RV
&$PHQGPHQWWRWKH,QGLFWPHQW
&KLOLQJLULDQDUJXHVWKDWWKHWULDOFRXUW¶VJHQHUDOILQGLQJRI
QRWJXLOW\RQWKHPDLODQGZLUHIUDXGFRXQWVZLWKLQ&RXQW
UHQGHUVWKHMXGJH¶VYHUGLFWIDWDOO\GHIHFWLYH6SHFLILFDOO\KH
DOOHJHVWKDWWKHIDLOXUHWRHVWDEOLVKWKHHOHPHQWVRIPDLODQG
ZLUHIUDXGPDQGDWHVWKDWWKHYHUGLFWPXVWEHUHYHUVHGEHFDXVH
WKHJXLOW\ILQGLQJUHVWVXSRQDQLPSHUPLVVLEOHDPHQGPHQWRI
WKH LQGLFWPHQW +H IXUWKHU DUJXHV WKDW WKLV HUURU JDYH WKH
JRYHUQPHQW D ZLGHU DQG XQODZIXO EHUWK DQG OHVVHQHG WKH
JRYHUQPHQW¶V EXUGHQ LQ HVWDEOLVKLQJ WKH DFW HOHPHQWV DV
FKDUJHGLQ&RXQW
7KH)LIWK$PHQGPHQWJXDUDQWHHVWKDWDQDFFXVHGEHWULHG
RQO\ RQ WKRVH RIIHQVHV SUHVHQWHG LQ DQ LQGLFWPHQW DQG
UHWXUQHGE\DJUDQGMXU\86&2167DPHQG96WLURQHY
8QLWHG 6WDWHV 86 ³>7@KH
FRQVWLWXWLRQDO ULJKWV RI DQ DFFXVHG DUH YLRODWHG ZKHQ D
PRGLILFDWLRQDWWULDODFWVWREURDGHQWKHFKDUJHFRQWDLQHGLQ
DQLQGLFWPHQW´8QLWHG6WDWHVY)RUG)G
WK&LU ³$YDULDQFH>WRWKHLQGLFWPHQW@RFFXUVZKHQ
μWKHFKDUJLQJWHUPV>RIWKHLQGLFWPHQW@DUHXQFKDQJHGEXWWKH
HYLGHQFHDWWULDOSURYHVIDFWVPDWHULDOO\GLIIHUHQWIURPWKRVH
DOOHJHG LQ WKH LQGLFWPHQW¶ ,Q FRQWUDVW DQ DPHQGPHQW
LQYROYHVDFKDQJHZKHWKHUOLWHUDORULQHIIHFWLQWKHWHUPVRI
WKHLQGLFWPHQW´8QLWHG6WDWHVY%DUURZ)G
WK&LU HPSKDVLVDGGHG ³7KLV&LUFXLWKDVKHOGWKDW
D YDULDQFH ULVHV WR WKH OHYHO RI D FRQVWUXFWLYH DPHQGPHQW
ZKHQWKHWHUPVRIDQLQGLFWPHQWDUHLQHIIHFWDOWHUHGE\WKH
SUHVHQWDWLRQ RI HYLGHQFH DQG MXU\ LQVWUXFWLRQV ZKLFK VR
PRGLI\HVVHQWLDOHOHPHQWVRIWKHRIIHQVHFKDUJHGWKDWWKHUHLV
D VXEVWDQWLDO OLNHOLKRRG WKDW WKH GHIHQGDQW PD\ KDYH EHHQ
FRQYLFWHG RI DQ RIIHQVH RWKHU WKDQ WKDW FKDUJHG LQ WKH
LQGLFWPHQW´,GVHHDOVR8QLWHG6WDWHVY$WLVKD)G
WK &LU H[SODLQLQJ WKDW D FRQVWUXFWLYH
DPHQGPHQWRFFXUVZKHQ³WKHUHKDVEHHQDPRGLILFDWLRQDW
WULDOLQWKHHOHPHQWVRIWKHFULPHFKDUJHG´ 7KHGHIHQGDQW
KDVWKHEXUGHQRISURRIRQWKLVLVVXH%DUURZ)GDW
1RV 8QLWHG6WDWHVY&KLOLQJLULDQ
WKH GHIHQGDQW WR ZDLW IRU WKH KHDULQJ SDQHO¶V GHFLVLRQ LV D
YLRODWLRQRIDQLQGLYLGXDO¶VGXHSURFHVVULJKWVXQGHUWKH)LIWK
$PHQGPHQW,QDGGLWLRQKHDUJXHVWKDWGHQLDORIEDLOIRUWKH
SULPDU\SXUSRVHRISXQLVKLQJWKHGHIHQGDQWLVXQUHDVRQDEOH
DQGYLRODWHVWKH(LJKWK$PHQGPHQW+RZHYHU&KLOLQJLULDQ
KDVQRWLGHQWLILHGDVLQJOHFDVHLQZKLFKDQ\FRXUWKDVKHOG
WKDWWKH%DLO5HIRUP$FWRILVXQFRQVWLWXWLRQDO7RWKH
FRQWUDU\WKLV&RXUWDQGRWKHUVKDYHJHQHUDOO\XSKHOGWKH$FW
DJDLQVWFRQVWLWXWLRQDOFKDOOHQJHV)RULQVWDQFHLQ3ROODUG
WKLV&RXUWKHOGWKDW³WKH%DLO5HIRUP$FWRIGRHVQRW
YLRODWH D GHIHQGDQW¶V SURFHGXUDO GXH SURFHVV ULJKWV E\
UHTXLULQJWKHGLVWULFWFRXUWWRGHWHUPLQHWKDWDQDSSHDOUDLVHV
DVXEVWDQWLDOLVVXHEHIRUHJUDQWLQJERQGSHQGLQJDSSHDO´
)GDWVHHDOVR8QLWHG6WDWHVY3HUU\)G
G &LU FHUW GHQLHG 86 federal
courts that have addressed the issue have held that there is no
absolute right to bail 8QLWHG6WDWHVY3RUWHV)G
WK &LU QHLWKHU WKH KLVWRULFDO HYLGHQFH QRU
FRQWHPSRUDU\ IXQGDPHQWDO YDOXHV LPSOLFLW LQ WKH FULPLQDO
MXVWLFHV\VWHPUHTXLUHVUHFRJQLWLRQRIWKHULJKWWREDLODVD
³EDVLFKXPDQULJKW´ZKLFKPXVWWKHQEHFRQVWUXHGWREHRI
FRQVWLWXWLRQDOGLPHQVLRQV 8QLWHG6WDWHVY*LDQJURVVR
)G WK&LU KROGLQJWKDW%DLO5HIRUP$FW
ZRXOGQRWYLRODWHWKH(LJKWK$PHQGPHQWDQGRUGXHSURFHVV
JXDUDQWHHV HYHQ LI WKH VWDQGDUG IRU JUDQWLQJ EDLO SHQGLQJ
DSSHDOLQYROYHVWKHTXHVWLRQRIZKHWKHUWKHORZHUFRXUWLV
OLNHO\ WR EH UHYHUVHG :H GR QRW VHH DQ\ FRQVWLWXWLRQDO
SUREOHPVZLWKWKLV$FWDQGOLNHZLVH&KLOLQJLULDQKDVQRW
UDLVHGDQ\
%,QFRQVLVWHQF\RI9HUGLFWV
7KHGLVWULFWFRXUWDFTXLWWHG&KLOLQJLULDQRQDOOFRXQWVRIWKH
LQGLFWPHQW H[FHSW &RXQW &RQVSLUDF\ WR /DXQGHU
0RQHWDU\ ,QVWUXPHQWV LQ YLRODWLRQ RI 86&
D $ L D % L DQG K
&KLOLQJLULDQ DUJXHV WKDW KLV DFTXLWWDO RQ WKH PDLO DQG ZLUH
IUDXGFRXQWVDQGFRQVSLUDF\WRFRPPLWPDLODQGZLUHIUDXG
XQGHU 86& ZDV LQFRQVLVWHQW ZLWK WKH FRXUW¶V
JXLOW\ YHUGLFW RQ &RXQW 7KH TXHVWLRQ RI ZKHWKHU DQ
-- 7 of 8 --
8QLWHG6WDWHVY&KLOLQJLULDQ 1RV
LQFRQVLVWHQW YHUGLFW UHQGHUHG E\ D MXGJH LV UHYLHZDEOH RU
JURXQGVIRUUHYHUVDORUDQHZWULDOKDVQRWEHHQUHVROYHGLQ
WKLVFLUFXLW
7KH 6XSUHPH &RXUW KDV KHOG WKDW ³D FULPLQDO GHIHQGDQW
FRQYLFWHG E\ D MXU\ RQ RQH FRXQW FRXOG QRW DWWDFN WKDW
FRQYLFWLRQEHFDXVHLWZDVLQFRQVLVWHQWZLWKWKHMXU\¶VYHUGLFW
RIDFTXLWWDORQDQRWKHUFRXQW´8QLWHG6WDWHVY3RZHOO
86 FLWLQJ'XQQY8QLWHG6WDWHV86
7KLVUXOHDSSOLHVHYHQZKHUHWKHMXU\DFTXLWVD
GHIHQGDQWRIDSUHGLFDWHIHORQ\DWWKHVDPHWLPHDVLWFRQYLFWV
RQWKHFRPSRXQGIHORQ\6HHLGDW
&KLOLQJLULDQKRZHYHUZDVWULHGWRWKHEHQFK+HDUJXHV
WKDWLQFRQVLVWHQWYHUGLFWVUHQGHUHGE\DMXGJHDUHUHYLHZDEOH
DV D FKHFN DJDLQVW DUELWUDU\ H[HUFLVHV RI SRZHU +H UHOLHV
SULPDULO\RQ8QLWHG6WDWHVY0D\EXU\)G G&LU
DQG8QLWHG6WDWHVY'X]0RU'LDJQRVWLF/DE,QF
)G WK&LU 1HLWKHUFDVHLVSHUVXDVLYH
$W WULDO WKH JRYHUQPHQW VXJJHVWHG WKDW LI &KLOLQJLULDQ
FRQVSLUHG WR ODXQGHU PRQH\ WKHQ KH DOVR FRQVSLUHG WR
GHIUDXG 'HIHQGDQW DVVHUWV WKDW WKHVH ILQGLQJV DUH
LQFRPSDWLEOH ZLWK WKH WKHRU\ RI WKH FDVH DQG PXVW EH
UHFRQFLOHG ZLWK WKH HYLGHQFH SUHVHQWHG &RQVHTXHQWO\ KH
DUJXHVWKDWWKHJXLOW\YHUGLFWRQWKHPRQH\ODXQGHULQJFRXQW
VKRXOGKDYHEHHQYDFDWHGDQGWKHGLVWULFWFRXUWVKRXOGKDYH
HQWHUHGKLVPRWLRQIRUDFTXLWWDORQWKDWFKDUJH
,Q +DUULV Y 5LYHUD 86 WKH 6XSUHPH
&RXUW FRQVLGHUHG WKH TXHVWLRQ RI LQFRQVLVWHQW YHUGLFWV
UHQGHUHG E\ D WULDO MXGJH 7KH &RXUW DFNQRZOHGJHG WKH
JHQHUDO UXOH WKDW ³>L@QFRQVLVWHQF\ LQ D YHUGLFW LV QRW D
VXIILFLHQW UHDVRQ IRU VHWWLQJ LW DVLGH´ DQG UHMHFWHG WKH
FRQWHQWLRQWKDW³DGLIIHUHQWUXOHVKRXOGEHDSSOLHGWRFDVHVLQ
ZKLFKDMXGJHLVWKHILQGHURIIDFW´,GDW+RZHYHU
+DUULVLVDFDVHRIFROODWHUDOUHYLHZ7KHGHIHQGDQWKDGEHHQ
FRQYLFWHGLQVWDWHFRXUWDQGKDGVXEPLWWHGDSHWLWLRQIRUDZULW
RI KDEHDV FRUSXV LQ IHGHUDO FRXUW DUJXLQJ WKDW KLV JXLOW\
YHUGLFW ZDV LQFRQVLVWHQW IURP KLV FRGHIHQGDQW¶V DFTXLWWDO
7KXVWKH&RXUWZDVOLPLWHGWRORRNLQJIRUDFRQVWLWXWLRQDO
1RV 8QLWHG6WDWHVY&KLOLQJLULDQ
YLRODWLRQDQGVSHFLILFDOO\QRWHGWKDW³WKLVFDVHGRHVQRWUDLVH
DQ\ TXHVWLRQ FRQFHUQLQJ WKH VLJQLILFDQFH WKDW DQ DSSHOODWH
FRXUWPD\DWWDFKWRDQDSSDUHQWLQFRQVLVWHQF\LQDYHUGLFWWKDW
LVVXEMHFWWRUHYLHZRQGLUHFWDSSHDO´,GDW
1RQHWKHOHVV WKH &RXUW¶V UDWLRQDOH WKDW LQFRQVLVWHQFLHV
DORQHVKRXOGQRWEHWKHVROHEDVLVIRUVHWWLQJDVLGHDFRXUW¶V
ILQGLQJ LV VWLOO DSSOLFDEOH KHUH 7KH &RXUW H[SODLQHG WKDW
LQFRQVLVWHQWYHUGLFWVFRXOGUHVXOWZKHQ
WKH MXGJH¶V DFWXDO REVHUYDWLRQ RI HYHU\WKLQJ WKDW
WUDQVSLUHGLQWKHFRXUWURRPFUHDWHGVRPHGRXEWDERXWWKH
JXLOWRIRQHGHIHQGDQWWKDWKHPLJKWRUPLJKWQRWEHDEOH
WRDUWLFXODWHLQDFRQYLQFLQJPDQQHU,QWKLVFDVHLIWKH
MXGJH ZDV FRQYLQFHG EH\RQG D UHDVRQDEOH GRXEW WKDW
>WZR GHIHQGDQWV@ ZHUH ERWK JXLOW\ LW ZRXOG EH PRVW
XQIRUWXQDWH LI D FRQFHUQ DERXW WKH SODXVLELOLW\ RI D
OLQJHULQJGRXEWDERXW>DWKLUGGHIHQGDQW@VKRXOGFDXVH
KLPWRGHFLGHWRFRQYLFWDOOWKUHHUDWKHUWKDQWRWU\WR
DUWLFXODWHWKHEDVLVIRUKLVGRXEW
,G DW 0RUHRYHU DQ DSSDUHQW LQFRQVLVWHQF\ LQ D WULDO
MXGJH V YHUGLFW GRHV QRW JLYH ULVH WR DQ LQIHUHQFH RI
LUUHJXODULW\LQKLVILQGLQJRIJXLOWWKDWLVVXIILFLHQWO\VWURQJWR
RYHUFRPH WKH SUHVXPSWLRQ WKDW WKH MXGJH DGKHUHG WR EDVLF
UXOHVRISURFHGXUH,G
%RWKSULRUDQGVXEVHTXHQWWR+DUULVRWKHUFLUFXLWVKDYH
KHOGWKDWLQFRQVLVWHQWYHUGLFWVUHQGHUHGE\DMXGJHSURYLGHQR
JUHDWHU JURXQGV IRU UHYHUVDO WKDQ LQFRQVLVWHQW YHUGLFWV
UHQGHUHGE\DMXU\6HHHJ8QLWHG6WDWHVY:HVW)G
WK&LU ³DGKHU>LQJ@WRWKHJHQHUDOUXOHWKDW
FRQVLVWHQF\ EHWZHHQ WKH YHUGLFWV RQ D PXOWLSOHFRXQW
LQGLFWPHQWLVXQQHFHVVDU\ZKHQDGHIHQGDQWLVFRQYLFWHGRQ
RQHRUPRUHFRXQWVEXWDFTXLWWHGRQWKHUHPDLQGHU´ 8QLWHG
6WDWHV Y :ULJKW )G WK &LU
KROGLQJ³LQFRQVLVWHQWYHUGLFWVZKHWKHUSURYLGHGE\MXULHV
RUMXGJHVDUHQRWVXEMHFWWRUHYHUVDOPHUHO\EHFDXVHWKH\DUH
LQFRQVLVWHQW´ :HDJUHHZLWKWKHUHDVRQLQJRIWKRVHFLUFXLWV
-- 8 of 8 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.