Moore, et al v. Ingalls Shipbuilding

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 99-60639
Summary Calendar
__________________
ALVIN MOORE; MARY KING; ROBERT BROWN;
JIMMIE DAILEY; SAMUEL WEBSTER,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus
INGALLS SHIPBUILDING, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
______________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
(1:97-CV-615-BrR)
______________________________________________
February 17, 2000
Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellants Alvin Moore, Mary King, Robert Brown, Jimmie
Dailey, and Samuel Webster appeal from an adverse summary
judgment dismissing a myriad of federal claims charging
discrimination with respect to race, sex, age, and/or disability
on the part of their employer and appellee Ingalls Shipbuilding,
Inc. After reviewing the briefs on appeal and the record before
the district court, our de novo review convinces us that the
district court correctly granted summary judgment as to all

-- 1 of 2 --

** Appellants also asserted state law claims before the
district court; however, the district court dismissed the state law
claims without prejudice and such claims are not a subject of this
appeal.
federal claims.** Accordingly, and essentially for the reasons
stated by Judge Bramlette in his memorandum opinion and order
dated August 19, 1999, the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --