Grand Oaks, Inc v. Anderson

* District Judge of the Western District of Louisiana, sitting by
designation.
** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_______________________
No. 99-60520
_______________________
GRAND OAKS, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ARTHUR W. ANDERSON; JERRY
HOLLINGSWORTH,
Defendants-Appellants.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Mississippi
(3:94-CV-159-S-D)
_________________________________________________________________
July 14, 2000
Before JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges, and WALTER*, District
Judge.
PER CURIAM:**
The court has carefully considered this appeal in light
of the briefs, oral arguments and pertinent portions of the record.
Having done so, we find no reversible error of law or fact. In
particular, considering Hollingsworth’s crucial role in the

-- 1 of 2 --

2
development of Grand Oaks, we cannot say that there was
insufficient evidence under the Boeing standard to send this case
to the jury. See Boeing Co. v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365, 374 (5th
Cir. 1969). As to Anderson, there was clearly sufficient evidence
to support the verdict. The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --