United States v. Rodriguez-Villa

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_______________
No. 99-40992
Summary Calendar
_______________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
VERSUS
PANCHO RODRIGUEZ-VILLA,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. L-99-CR-118-1
_________________________
March 14, 2000
Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Panco
Rodriguez-Villa has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief as
required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rodriguez-
Villa has not filed a response. Our independent review of the
brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly,
the motion to withdraw is granted, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.

-- 1 of 1 --