Sparks v. Lockheed Martin, et al

99-20485Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit24 de jan. de 2004

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-20485
Summary Calendar
CAROLYNN C SPARKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
VERSUS
LOCKHEED MARTIN AEROSPACE CORP; LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
(H-97-CV-3995)
December 28, 1999
Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Carolynn Sparks appeals the district court’s grant of summary
judgment for Lockheed Martin on her claims of breach of contract
and retaliation under the False Claims Act. These claims arise out
of Lockheed Martin’s termination of Sparks’s employment. Having
carefully reviewed the record and fully considered the briefs of
counsel, we AFFIRM for essentially the reasons set forth in the
district court’s Memorandum and Order dated April 13, 1999.

-- 1 of 1 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.