United States v. Chaudhari

19-20340United States Court Of Appeals For The 5th Circuit8 de jan. de 2020

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-20340
Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

JAGDISHKUMAR CHAUDHARI, also known as Jagdish,

Defendant - Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:16-CR-385-26

Before BARKSDALE, HAYNES, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
*

Jagdishkumar Chaudhari appeals his guilty-plea conviction and
sentence for conspiracy to commit money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
§§ 1956(a)(1)(B)(i) and 1956(h). The district court sentenced him to, inter alia,
108 months’ imprisonment. Chaudhari, however, contends only that he
received ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing because his attorney

*
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
January 8, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Case: 19-20340 Document: 00515263690 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/08/2020

No. 19-20340
2
failed to object to the court’s claimed incorrect calculation of the advisory
Sentencing Guidelines sentencing range.
Because trial records “may contain no evidence of alleged errors of
omission, much less the reasons underlying them”, the preferred method for
resolving ineffective-assistance claims is by a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, not a
direct appeal. Massaro v. United States, 538 U.S. 500, 504–05 (2003). Review
on direct appeal, however, is appropriate in the “rare case[]” whose record
provides details about his attorney’s “conduct and motivations”. United States
v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014) (internal quotation marks and
citation omitted).
The record in this instance provides no details about why Chaudhari’s
attorney failed to object. Accordingly, we decline to consider his claim, without
prejudice to his right to pursue it pursuant to § 2255.
AFFIRMED.
Case: 19-20340 Document: 00515263690 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/08/2020

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.