Romantic Adventures, et al v. Roe, et al

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
March 13, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 05-60229
_____________________
ROMANTIC ADVENTURES, a division of HCH Corporation Inc.;
CRAIG HARRIS; GEORGE CLINTON; TOM HARRIS; EMPLOYEE #1; EMPLOYEE #2,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
RANDY ROE, Individually and as Deputy Sheriff of Rankin County,
Mississippi; RONNIE PENNINGTON, Individually and as Sheriff of
Rankin County, Mississippi,
Defendants - Appellees.
__________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 3:04-CV-343
_________________________________________________________________
Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
After reviewing the briefs and hearing oral argument from the
parties, we are convinced that the district court did not err in
any respect and consequently affirm the judgment essentially for
the reasons the court articulated in its thorough opinion.
AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR R. 47.6.

-- 1 of 1 --