United States v. Lujan-Calzada

03-50641Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit10 de dez. de 2003

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
December 10, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-50641
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARGARITA LUJAN-CALZADA,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. EP-02-CR-1906-2-DB
--------------------
Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Nancy G. Revelette, the attorney appointed to represent
Margarita Lujan-Calzada, has moved for leave to withdraw and has
filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967). Lujan-Calzada has filed no response to Revelette’s
motion. Our independent review of the record and Revelette’s
brief shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.
Accordingly, Revelette’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
Revelette is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
this appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 1 of 1 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.