United States v. Bencosme

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
May 4, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-40154
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-
Appellee,
versus
SAMUEL D. BENCOSME, also known as Samuel De Jesus
Bencosme De La Cruz,
Defendant-
Appellant.
----------------------------------------------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:02-CR-157-1
---------------------------------------------------------
Before SMITH, DeMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:*
Samuel D. Bencosme entered a conditional guilty plea to possession of cocaine with intent
to distribute the same. He appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress all physical,
documentary, and other evidence that was seized after he consented to have his car searched
following a traffic stop. Bencosme fails to show that the district court’s finding that Bencosme

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
voluntarily consented to the search of his automobile was clearly erroneous. See United States v.
Mendoza-Gonzalez, 318 F.3d 663, 666 (5th Cir. 2003); United States v. Zucco, 71 F.3d 188, 191
(5th Cir. 1995).
The district court’s denial of Bencosme’s motion to suppress evidence is AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --