Summary Calendar United States of America v. Lawrence Nakauchi, also known as Sam Peters, also known as Kevin Yamato, also known…

1Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R.
47.5.4.
-1-
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
January 30, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_________________________
No. 03-30337
SUMMARY CALENDAR
_________________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LAWRENCE NAKAUCHI, also known as Sam Peters, also known as Kevin Yamato, also
known as Robert Wright,
Defendant - Appellant.
______________________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Louisiana
(02-CR-25-L)
______________________________________________________________________________
Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
REYNALDO G. GARZA, Circuit Judge:1
In this appeal, we review Defendant - Appellant’s, Lawrence Nakauchi (hereinafter,
“Nakauchi”), conviction and sentence for conspiracy to posses with intent to distribute MDMA,
commonly know as Ecstasy, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846.
Nakauchi argues that the district court erred by including approximately 22,000 tablets of

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
MDMA in its sentencing calculations. Nakauchi claims he had withdrawn from the conspiracy to
posses with the intent to distribute the drugs because he had already been arrested and given a
confession to authorities prior to the government’s seizure of the 22,000 tablets of MDMA.
We review the district court’s interpretation and application of the Sentencing Guidelines
de novo and its factual findings for clear error. United States v. Huerta, 182 F.3d 361, 364 (5th
Cir. 1999).
A defendant is presumed to continue in a conspiracy unless he makes a substantial
affirmative showing of withdrawal, abandonment, or defeat of the conspiratorial purpose. United
States v. Torres, 114 F.3d 520, 525 (5th Cir. 1997). The district court did not clearly err in finding
that Nakauchi’s confession to authorities was insufficient to show his withdrawal from the
conspiracy. The record indicates that Nakauchi provided only limited information, not a full
confession. See United States v. Jimenez, 622 F.2d 753, 757-58 (5th Cir. 1980).
For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the conviction and sentence.

-- 2 of 2 --