Johnson v. Tepper

02-51232Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit1 de abr. de 2003

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
March 31, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-51232
Summary Calendar
R. WAYNE JOHNSON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
MATTHEW TEPPER,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
(02-CV-656)
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
R. Wayne Johnson, Texas prisoner # 282756, appeals the
district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as
frivolous. In his complaint, Johnson alleged that the defendant
violated his constitutional rights by using his full first name
when addressing correspondence to him.

-- 1 of 2 --

1 See Black v. Warren, 134 F.3d 732, 733 (5th Cir. 1998).
2 See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983).
3 See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
4 See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996).
5 See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
2
On appeal Johnson argues that the district court erred in
dismissing his complaint as frivolous because he has a First
Amendment right to be identified as “R. Wayne Johnson.” Johnson
has not shown that the district court abused its discretion when it
dismissed his complaint as frivolous.1
Johnson’s appeal is without merit and is frivolous.2
Accordingly, his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous.3
Johnson is cautioned that the district court’s dismissal of
his complaint and this court’s dismissal of his appeal count as two
strikes against him for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).4 Johnson
is further cautioned that if he accumulates three strikes, he may
not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal while
he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is in
imminent danger of serious physical injury.5
APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.