Iruegas-Maciel v. Dobre

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
May 16, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-41508
Summary Calendar
ALFREDO ANTONIO IRUEGAS-MACIEL,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
JONATHON DOBRE, Warden,
Respondent-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:02-CV-226
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, DEMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Alfredo Antonio Iruegas-Maciel (Iruegas), federal inmate
# 37644-079, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Iruegas’ claim that he was denied
due process in connection with his disciplinary hearing is
without merit since the disciplinary proceedings complied with
the requirements set forth in Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539,
556-57 (1974). Additionally, Iruegas’ claim that prison
officials failed to follow their own policies, without more, does

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 02-41508
-2-
not constitute a violation of due process. Myers v. Klevenhagen,
97 F.3d 91, 94 (5th Cir. 1996).
The district court’s decision is therefore AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --