Rheams, et al v. Marler, et al

02-30959Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit21 de mai. de 2003

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
May 20, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-30959
Summary Calendar
HELEN RHEAMS, on behalf of Walter James Rheams;
TAMMY RHEAMS; ALISHA MONIQUE THOMAS, on behalf of
Jamilah Monet Rheams,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus
VICTOR MARLER, ETC.; ET AL.,
Defendants,
VICTOR MARLER, Officer; UNITED NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.;
JASON POE; LARRY JONES, Special Agent; WILLIE GRAVES;
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Louisiana
USDC No. 00-CV-912
--------------------
Before GARWOOD, WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellants appeal from a judgment dismissing their 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 suit pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994).

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 02-30959
-2-
They assign error to the district court’s determination that
Walter Rheams’s pending criminal proceedings mandated that the
suit be dismissed or, alternatively, stayed until resolution of
the criminal proceedings. Rheams’s death during the pendency of
this appeal, however, necessarily brings a premature end to his
criminal proceedings. See United States v. Estate of Parsons,
314 F.3d 745, 748 (5th Cir. 2002). We therefore vacate the
judgment of the district court dismissing the suit and remand the
case for further proceedings.
VACATED AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.