Johnson v. Sch Bd Vermilion Par

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
October 22, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-30857
Conference Calendar
SHIRLEY JOHNSON,
on behalf of Kioki Johnson,
Individually and Tutor,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
SCHOOL BOARD VERMILION PARISH; ET AL.,
Defendants,
SCHOOL BOARD VERMILION PARISH,
Defendant-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 99-CV-1889
--------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, Shirley Johnson,
acting on behalf of her minor daughter, Kioki, appeals the
magistrate judge’s dismissal of her harassment suit brought under
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681.

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 02-30857
-2-
Johnson contends, in a single paragraph in the argument section
of her appellate brief, that the magistrate judge erred in
determining that the defendant’s response to the sexual
harassment allegations fell short of the deliberate indifference
required for recovery. Johnson’s brief is inadequate to preserve
this issue for appeal since she neither refers to the record nor
cites legal authority. FED. R. APP. P. 28(a)(9). Accordingly,
she has waived this claim. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222,
224-25 (5th Cir. 1993)(issues must be properly briefed to be
preserved for appeal). In any event, the evidence adduced at
trial supports the magistrate judge’s findings. See Davis v.
Monroe County Bd. of Educ., 526 U.S. 629, 643, 650 (1999).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --