Avalos v. Atlantic Richfield

02-20947Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit21 de out. de 2003

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
October 22, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-20947
Conference Calendar
ELZINA AVALOS; ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,
versus
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY; ET AL.,
Defendants,
versus
CLAUDE HUGH LLOYD, JR.,
Movant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-89-CV-3487
--------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Claude Hugh Lloyd, Jr., appeals from the district court’s
order denying his Emergency Motion for Leave and Motion for Nunc
Pro Tunc Order with Judicial Notice, in which he sought to be
substituted for Mary Beth Angel as trustee of the Lloyd Trust for

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 02-20947
-2-
purposes of the above-referenced litigation. Lloyd has also
filed a Motion for Summary Reversal and Designation of Orders on
Appeal.
Lloyd’s nunc pro tunc motion was an unauthorized motion,
which the district court should have dismissed for lack of
jurisdiction. See United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 142
(5th Cir. 1994). We affirm the judgment on this alternative
basis. See id. Lloyd’s Motion for Summary Reversal and
Designation of Orders on Appeal is denied.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.