Florists Ins Svc Inc, et al v. Cole

01-60342Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit18 de set. de 2001

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in
5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-60342
Summary Calendar
FLORISTS INSURANCE SERVICE,
INC.; EVERGREEN, INC.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus
CATHY COLE, Etc.; ET AL,
Defendants,
GREAT RIVER INSURANCE CO.,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 3:00-CV-565-LN
September 17, 2001
Before POLITZ, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Florists Insurance Service, Inc., and Evergreen, Inc., appeal an adverse summary
judgment dismissing with prejudice their demands against Great River Insurance
Company. Review of the record, briefs, and guidance jurisprudence convinces us that
no error was committed by the trial court. Accordingly, on the uncontested facts as
noted, authorities cited, and analysis made by the district court in its careful,
comprehensive, and persuasive Memorandum Opinion and Order dated March 15,
2001, and entered March 16, 2001, the judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.