United States v. Goujil

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-41074
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MOHAMMED GOUJIL,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. C-01-CR-41-1
May 16, 2002
Before POLITZ, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Mohammed Goujil appeals his sentence for passport fraud under 18 U.S.C.
§ 1546(a), asserting that the district court erred in assessing a two-level upward
adjustment at sentencing based on obstruction of justice under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1.

-- 1 of 2 --

1 United States v. Greer, 158 F.3d 228, 233 (5th Cir. 1998) (internal citations
omitted).
2 Id.
3 See U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1, comment (n.4).
2
Finding no error in Goujil’s sentence, we affirm.
We review the district court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines de
novo and its factual findings, such as a finding of obstruction of justice, for clear
error.1 We will uphold a sentence on appeal unless it was imposed in violation of
law; imposed as a result of an incorrect application of the sentencing guidelines;
or outside the range of the applicable sentencing guideline and is unreasonable.2
The district court imposed the adjustment in the instant action after finding that
Goujil tried to threaten a witness via a letter, and that he lied to the court and to his
probation officer regarding his credentials and his reasons for not wanting to return
to Morocco. This conduct falls squarely within the list of behaviors cited in the
commentary to § 3C1.1 describing conduct that constitutes obstruction of justice.3
Accordingly, the district court did not err in assessing a two-level upward
adjustment for obstruction of justice.
The sentence imposed by the district court is AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --