United States v. Jackson

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-30638
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LARRY D. JACKSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
USDC No. 00-CR-222-2-B
--------------------
January 29, 2003
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Larry D. Jackson entered a conditional guilty plea to
conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, being a
felon in possession of a firearm, and possession with intent to
distribute cocaine. He appeals his conviction on the ground of
the issue he preserved for appeal.
The district court’s finding that Jackson consented to the
search was not clearly erroneous under the totality of the

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 01-30638
-2-
circumstances in light of the testimony at the suppression
hearing that Jackson was not coerced into giving his consent.
United States v. Shabazz, 993 F.2d 431, 437 (5th Cir. 1993);
United States v. Gonzales, 121 F.3d 928, 938 (5th Cir. 1997).
The judgment of conviction is AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --