Summary Calendar ALONSO AGUILAR-MEDINA v. JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney General

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-51080
Summary Calendar
ALONSO AGUILAR-MEDINA
Petitioner - Appellant
v.
JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney General; LUIS GARCIA, District
Director of the El Paso District of the Immigration
Naturalization Service
Respondents - Appellees
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. EP-00-CV-294-DB
- - - - - - - - - -
May 18, 2001
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Alonso Aguilar-Medina (Aguilar) appeals the district court’s
dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for lack of
jurisdiction. He argues that the district court erroneously
concluded that he had not filed a petition for review from the
Board of Immigration Appeals’ order of removal.
The district court was without jurisdiction to entertain
Aguilar’s § 2241 petition. See Garnica-Vazquez v. Reno, 210 F.3d
558, 560 (5th Cir. 2000); Max-George v. Reno, 205 F.3d 194, 199

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 00-51080
-2-
(5th Cir. 2000). Aguilar has not attempted to distinguish
Garnica-Vazquez or Max-George, which the district court relied
upon to reach its decision. Nor has Aguilar explained the
relevance of the district court’s alleged erroneous factual
finding to the jurisdictional issue at hand. The district
court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --