00-40969•United States v. Corpus-De La Riva
00-40969Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit23 de ago. de 2001
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-40969
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MANUEL CORPUS-DE LA RIVA,
also known as Manuel Corpus Corpus,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. L-00-CR-420-1
- - - - - - - - - -
August 23, 2001
Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Manuel Corpus de la Riva (“Corpus”) appeals the conviction
and sentence for illegal reentry into the United States in
violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2). He contends that the
felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence under 8
U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was an element of the offense that should
have been charged in the indictment.
Corpus acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by
Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 00-40969
-2-
seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of
Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Apprendi did not
overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 490-91;
United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert.
denied, 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). This argument fails.
Corpus also argues that his indictment was defective under
the Fifth and Sixth Amendments because it did not allege general
intent. This argument is foreclosed by this court’s recent
decision in United States v. Berrios-Centeno, 250 F.3d 294 (5th
Cir. 2001). The indictment fairly conveyed that Corpus’ presence
was a voluntary act from the allegations that he was excluded,
deported, or removed, and that he had subsequently been found in
the United States without consent of the Attorney General. Id.
at 299-300.
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.