United States v. Bailey

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-40662
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MITCHELL HAYWARD BAILEY,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. C-00-CR-24-1
--------------------
April 12, 2001
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Mitchell Hayward Bailey
has filed a motion to withdraw from representation of Bailey and
a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Bailey has not responded to counsel’s brief. Our independent
review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous
issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED;
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 1 of 1 --