United States v. O'Grady

*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_______________________
No. 00-40509
Summary Calendar
Civil Docket #B-99-CR-460-1
_______________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TERRY O’GRADY,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
_________________________________________________________________
February 1, 2001
Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender (FPD) appointed to represent
Terry O’Grady has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). O’Grady
has received a copy of the FPD’s motion and brief but has not filed
a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the FPD’s motion to

-- 1 of 2 --

2
withdraw is GRANTED. The FPD is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
R. 42.2.

-- 2 of 2 --