United States v. Garcia

00-40176Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit22 de set. de 2000

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R.
47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-40176
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROGELIO GARCIA,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. B-99-CR-163-1
- - - - - - - - - -
September 21, 2000
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rogelio
Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as
required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Garcia
has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief
and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 1 of 1 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.