Billy Joe Pelfrey v. D. CASTLE, Officer, Badge 175HPD

99-7529Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2 de mai. de 2000

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7529
BILLY JOE PELFREY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
D. CASTLE, Officer, Badge #175HPD,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
CITY OF HUNTINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY OF
HUNTINGTON CITY HALL; LEE BLACK, Chief of
Police,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District
Judge. (CA-98-450-3)
Submitted: April 27, 2000 Decided: May 2, 2000
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Billy Joe Pelfrey, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Carter Elkins, Laura
L. Gray, CAMPBELL, WOODS, BAGLEY, EMERSON, MCNEER & HERNDON, Hunt-
ington, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Billy Joe Pelfrey appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Pelfrey v. Castle, No. CA-98-450-3 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 23, 1999). We
further deny Pelfrey’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.