Gregory Donnell Goodman v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 4th Cir. 1986 . 2 PER CURIAM: Gregory Donnell Goodman…

99-6549Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19 de jan. de 2000

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6549
GREGORY DONNELL GOODMAN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
DAVID A. GARRAGHTY, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge.
(CA-99-299-AM)
Submitted: January 13, 2000 Decided: January 19, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Donnell Goodman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on
April 2, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was
entered on the docket sheet on April 7, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58
and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date
the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the
effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.
Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).
2
PER CURIAM:
Gregory Donnell Goodman seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254
(West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. According-
ly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal
on the reasoning of the district court. See Goodman v. Garraghty,
No. CA-99-299-AM (E.D. Va. Apr. 7, 1999). * We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.