Alveda Ingram Richardson v. Marcia G. Shein

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1862
ALVEDA INGRAM RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARCIA G. SHEIN,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
FEDERAL CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS LAW CENTER,
INCORPORATED,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-
97-3439-CCB)
Submitted: December 22, 1999 Decided: January 13, 2000
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Alveda Ingram Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua R. Treem,
SCHULMAN, TREEM, KAMINKOW & GILDEN, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Alveda Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying
her motion for summary judgment and granting Marcia Shein’s cross-
motion for summary judgment in Richardson’s legal malpractice and
breach of contract action. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. According-
ly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Richard-
son v. Shein, No. CA-97-3439-CCB (D. Md. May 27, 1999). We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --