Marcus L. Carnes v. S. BRYSON, Dentist, USP Lee

20-6922United States Court Of Appeals For The 4th Circuit28 de ago. de 2020

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6922

MARCUS L. CARNES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

S. BRYSON, Dentist, USP Lee,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. James P. Jones, District Judge. (7:20-cv-00217-JPJ-PMS)

Submitted: August 25, 2020 Decided: August 28, 2020

Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marcus L. Carnes, Appellant Pro Se. Krista Consiglio Frith, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:
Marcus L. Carnes appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action
seeking injunctive relief pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau
of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), without prejudice for failure to comply with a court
order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of
discretion in the district court’s decision to dismiss the action without prejudice. See
Attkisson v. Holder, 925 F.3d 606, 625 (4th Cir. 2019) (discussing relevant considerations);
Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93, 95 (4th Cir. 1989) (standard of review). Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carnes v. Bryson, No. 7:20-cv-00217-
JPJ-PMS (W.D. Va. June 10, 2020). We deny Carnes’ motion to consolidate and for
summary reversal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.