United States of America v. Daryl Bernard Tyson

20-6389United States Court Of Appeals For The 4th Circuit28 de ago. de 2020

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6389

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DARYL BERNARD TYSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (4:10-cr-00094-D-1)

Submitted: August 25, 2020 Decided: August 28, 2020

Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daryl Bernard Tyson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:
Daryl Bernard Tyson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
appointment of counsel to represent him in the filing of a motion pursuant to the First Step
Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Tyson, No. 4:10-cr-00094-D-1 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2020). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.