Tyrone Peele v. Jack A. Williford

20-6119United States Court Of Appeals For The 4th Circuit13 de ago. de 2020

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6119

TYRONE PEELE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JACK A. WILLIFORD,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, District Judge. (5:19-cv-00229-D)

Submitted: May 19, 2020 Decided: August 13, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Peele, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Peele appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We
therefore affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Peele v. Williford, No. 5:19-
cv -00229-D (E.D.N.C. Dec. 17, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.