Melinda Smith v. WARDEN ENTZEL of SFF HAZELTON

20-6049United States Court Of Appeals For The 4th Circuit22 de mai. de 2020

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6049

MELINDA SMITH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN ENTZEL of SFF HAZELTON,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:18-cv -00055-GMG)

Submitted: May 19, 2020 Decided: May 22, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melinda Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:
Melinda Smith, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Smith’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2018) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Smith v. Entzel, No. 3:18-cv -
00055-GMG (N.D.W. Va., Dec. 13, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.