In re: Ernest Keith, Jr.

20-1206United States Court Of Appeals For The 4th Circuit22 de mai. de 2020

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1206

In re: ERNEST KEITH, JR.,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(3:17-cr-00180-MOC-DSC-1; 3:19-cv-00209-MOC)

Submitted: May 19, 2020 Decided: May 22, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ernest Keith, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:

Ernest Keith, Jr., petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court
has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2018) motion. He seeks an order from
this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals
that the district court has since denied relief on Keith’s § 2255 motion. Accordingly,
because the district court has recently decided Keith’s case, we deny the mandamus petition
as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.