In re: Catherine Denise Randolph

20-1157United States Court Of Appeals For The 4th Circuit27 de mai. de 2020

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1157

In re: CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,

Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:15-mc-00369)

Submitted: May 21, 2020 Decided: May 27, 2020

Before AGEE and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:
Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s order returning her pleadings
because the pleadings did not comply with the prefiling injunction and did not state a
plausible cause of action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Randolph’s motion to
expedite discovery and appoint an expert witness, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.