19-7760•Chase Adam Marsh v. LESLIE FLEMING, Warden
19-7760United States Court Of Appeals For The 4th Circuit21 de mai. de 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7760
CHASE ADAM MARSH,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
LESLIE FLEMING, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:19-cv-00099-REP-RCY)
Submitted: May 19, 2020 Decided: May 21, 2020
Before NIEMEYER, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chase Adam Marsh, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Chase Adam Marsh, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order
granting Respondent’s motion to dismiss and dismissing Marsh’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2018)
petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was
not timely filed.
Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or
order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the
appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.
App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional
requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
The district court’s order was entered on the docket on October 11, 2019. The notice
of appeal was filed on November 16, 2019.
∗
Because Marsh failed to file a timely notice
of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
∗
For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of
appeal is the earliest date it could have been delivered to prison officials for mailing to the
court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.