Walter D. Booker v. R. TIMMONS, Unit Manager

19-7012Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22 de nov. de 2019

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7012
WALTER D. BOOKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
R. TIMMONS, Unit Manager; B.M. CLAUDE, Lieutenant; T. ROBINSON,
Sergeant; G.D. FAULCON, Sergeant; LIEUTENANT TAYLOR; M.L. ROOK,
Correctional Officer,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections Operations; WENDY S. HOBBS,
Regional Administrator; EDDIE L. PEARSON, Lead Warden; C. PARKER,
Warden; J. HARRIS, Warden; C. BOONE, Regional Ombudsman; S. TAPP, Human
Rights Advocate; K. WHITEHEAD, Grievance Coordinator; L. GOODE, Unit
Manager; D. DUGGER, Institutional Hearings Officer,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00555-AJT-IDD)
Submitted: November 19, 2019 Decided: November 22, 2019
Before WILKINSON and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Walter D. Booker, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Walter D. Booker appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P.
60(b)(6) motion as untimely. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Booker v. Timmons,
No. 1:14-cv-00555-AJT-IDD (E.D. Va. June 5, 2019). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.