19-1625•Angela L. G. Weinerth v. the Martinsville City School Board
19-1625United States Court Of Appeals For The 4th Circuit16 de mar. de 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1625
ANGELA L. G. WEINERTH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE MARTINSVILLE CITY SCHOOL BOARD,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
ZEBEDEE TALLEY, JR.; THE MARTINSVILLE CITY COUNCIL; CITY OF
MARTINSVILLE, VIRGINIA, A Municipal Corporation,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Danville. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge. (4:17-cv-00067-MFU)
Submitted: March 12, 2020 Decided: March 16, 2020
Before KING, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Glen Franklin Koontz, KOONTZ P.C., Berryville, Virginia, for Appellant. James A. L.
Daniel, Martha White Medley, Khalilah A. Walters, Michael Anthony Nicholas, DANIEL,
2
MEDLEY & KIRBY, PC, Danville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3
PER CURIAM:
Angela L. G. Weinerth appeals the district court’s order granting the Martinsville
City School Board summary judgment on her race and gender discrimination claims,
brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-
17 (2018), and her age discrimination claim, brought pursuant to the Age Discrimination
in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (2018). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Weinerth v. Martinsville City Sch. Bd., No. 4:17-cv-00067-MFU (W.D.
Va. May 20, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.