Scott Marshall v. at&Tmobility Services, LLC; Kent Mathy

19-1437United States Court Of Appeals For The 4th Circuit8 de jul. de 2020

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1437

SCOTT MARSHALL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES, LLC; KENT MATHY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-01577-CMC)

Submitted: May 21, 2020 Decided: July 8, 2020

Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas K. Barlow, HALLIGAN MAHONEY WILLIAMS SMITH FAWLEY &
REAGLE, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Leon H. Lee, Jr., AT&T
SERVICES, INC., Atlanta, Georgia; Matthew S. Brown, LITTLER MENDELSON P.C.,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:
Scott Marshall appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and denying relief on his employment discrimination claim. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Marshall v. AT&T Mobility Servs., LLC, No. 3:17-cv-01577-
CMC (D.S.C. Mar. 20, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.