William C. Pumphrey v. JOE COAKLEY, Complex Warden

17-6823Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20 de out. de 2017

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6823
WILLIAM C. PUMPHREY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
JOE COAKLEY, Complex Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-00199-IMK-MJA)
Submitted: October 17, 2017 Decided: October 20, 2017
Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William C. Pumphrey, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Erin Carter Tison,
Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
William C. Pumphrey, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Pumphrey’s 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pumphrey v. Coakley,
No. 1:16-cv-00199-IMK-MJA (N.D.W. Va. June 21, 2017). We further deny as moot
Pumphrey’s motion to expedite decision. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.